From 62276f5f0f40fa66f91bfb3a6678e62ef82e9885 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: emilybache Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 11:51:16 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] tweaked formatting --- README.md | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 83f8e59d..c8c08088 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ +# Gilded Rose Refactoring Kata + This Kata was originally created by Terry Hughes (http://twitter.com/#!/TerryHughes). It is already on GitHub [here](https://github.com/NotMyself/GildedRose). See also [Bobby Johnson's description of the kata](http://iamnotmyself.com/2011/02/13/refactor-this-the-gilded-rose-kata/). I translated the original C# into a few other languages, (with a little help from my friends!), and slightly changed the starting position. This means I've actually done a small amount of refactoring already compared with the original form of the kata, and made it easier to get going with writing tests by giving you one failing unit test to start with. I also added test fixtures for Text-Based approval testing with TextTest (see [the TextTests](https://github.com/emilybache/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata/tree/master/texttests)) @@ -40,7 +42,7 @@ I've also set this kata up on [cyber-dojo](http://cyber-dojo.org) for several la - [Python](http://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork/297041AA7A?avatar=lion&tag=4) - [Cucumber, Java](http://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork/0F82D4BA89?avatar=gorilla&tag=45) - for this one I've also written some step definitions for you -# Better Code Hub +## Better Code Hub I analysed this repo according to the clean code standards on [Better Code Hub](https://bettercodehub.com) just to get an independent opinion of how bad the code is. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the compliance score is low!