OpenSource/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/emilybache/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata.git synced 2025-12-12 12:22:12 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

added better code hub badge to readme file

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
emilybache 2017-05-12 11:50:14 +02:00
parent 7613d0b921
commit f76aff16c0
1 changed files with 6 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
README.md
View File

@ -39,3 +39,9 @@ I've also set this kata up on [cyber-dojo](http://cyber-dojo.org) for several la
- [RSpec, Ruby](http://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork/8E58B0AD16?avatar=raccoon&tag=3) - [RSpec, Ruby](http://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork/8E58B0AD16?avatar=raccoon&tag=3)
- [Python](http://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork/297041AA7A?avatar=lion&tag=4) - [Python](http://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork/297041AA7A?avatar=lion&tag=4)
- [Cucumber, Java](http://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork/0F82D4BA89?avatar=gorilla&tag=45) - for this one I've also written some step definitions for you - [Cucumber, Java](http://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork/0F82D4BA89?avatar=gorilla&tag=45) - for this one I've also written some step definitions for you
# Better Code Hub
I analysed this repo according to the clean code standards on [Better Code Hub](https://bettercodehub.com) just to get an independent opinion of how bad the code is. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the compliance score is low!
[![BCH compliance](https://bettercodehub.com/edge/badge/emilybache/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata?branch=master)](https://bettercodehub.com/)