6 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Abhishek Sharma 9a62b94e22 docs(readme): the catalog heading says 24, the section lists 25
`## All 24 Skills` is contradicted by the sentence directly beneath it —
"The pack includes 25 skills total" — and by the section's own contents:

    skills listed under the heading   25
    directories under skills/         25
    validate-skills --strict          25 skills checked
    difference                        (none)

The section does list every skill, meta-skill included, in its own `Meta`
subsection. So 25 is the honest number for the heading.

The nearby "24 lifecycle skills plus the `using-agent-skills` meta-skill"
phrasing is correct and is left alone — 24 is a real count, just not of
what the heading is counting.

Also retargets the one inbound anchor, which the rename would otherwise
break:

    docs/adoption-guide.md:5  ...README.md#all-24-skills -> #all-25-skills

That link is the only reference to the anchor anywhere in the repo
(checked across md/json/ts/js), so the rename is complete.

Gates: validate-skills --strict 25 skills, 0 errors, 0 warnings; the JS
suite 44 pass / 0 fail.
2026-09-14 13:24:35 -07:00
vam a71eb51e05 docs: avoid double skill routing on native hosts 2026-09-05 11:45:31 +08:00
DEOWL-kan 878d5d4789 docs: explain lifecycle session handoffs (#513) 2026-09-05 11:13:50 +08:00
Addy Osmani 217feb229f docs: route to constraint-driven-development and refresh skill counts 2026-08-08 09:57:00 -07:00
Joan Leon 27dcc32b83 docs(adoption-guide): name the merge-blocking review labels
Per review: the severity-label taxonomy's point is the labels that gate a
merge (Critical and Required), with Nit/Optional/FYI being the don't-block
side. In a doc about protecting a legacy codebase, name the blocking half
instead of only the optional one; let the skill remain the source of the
full taxonomy.
2026-07-12 19:47:07 +02:00
Joan Leon ffd7db67e3 docs: add adoption guide (greenfield vs brownfield rollout)
Add docs/adoption-guide.md covering two rollout paths: full lifecycle
from day one for a greenfield project, and an incremental,
verification-first path for an established codebase. Link it from the
README (new Adoption section) and from getting-started.md's Recommended
Setup as the in-depth companion to the quick setup.
2026-07-12 14:16:49 +02:00