From 511af1cea0fddda295b68c5f7edc146a738d4411 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jesse Glick Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:59:45 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Noting that CloudSlaveRetentionStrategy appears to be a poor reimplementation of CloudRetentionStrategy. --- .../main/java/hudson/slaves/CloudSlaveRetentionStrategy.java | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/core/src/main/java/hudson/slaves/CloudSlaveRetentionStrategy.java b/core/src/main/java/hudson/slaves/CloudSlaveRetentionStrategy.java index d8d1dc0e5b..0c965508a3 100644 --- a/core/src/main/java/hudson/slaves/CloudSlaveRetentionStrategy.java +++ b/core/src/main/java/hudson/slaves/CloudSlaveRetentionStrategy.java @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ import java.util.logging.Logger; * If a slave is idle for 10 mins, this retention strategy will remove the slave. This can be used as-is for * a {@link Node} provisioned by cloud to implement the auto-scaling semantics, it can be subtyped to tweak * the behavior, or it can be used as an example. - * + *

TODO {@link CloudRetentionStrategy} seems to be a better implementation. * @author Kohsuke Kawaguchi * @since 1.510 */