* feat(binary-layout): admit ELF64 AArch64 and name the refused host
inspect_binary_layout refused every AArch64 ELF, and on a non-x64 host the
refusal read "supports Linux x64 only", which looked like a target refusal
(#8709 ran on arm64 WSL and suspected an e_machine check).
The pwntools adapter now admits little-endian ELF64 AArch64 EXEC/DYN/REL
objects alongside the existing profiles, pwntools must report aarch64/64/
little, and the Evidence subject names arm64. The host refusal now names the
detected platform/arch and says the target was not read; the host check
itself is unchanged.
verify:binary:layout cross-compiles an AArch64 executable and relocatable
object (never executed) and checks sections, symbols and relocations
against GNU readelf, decoding ELF64 r_info as a 32-bit type under a 32-bit
symbol index. The real-binary-layout workflow installs the toolchain.
Refs #8709
* test(binary-layout): refuse RISC-V as the unsupported machine and assert the host refusal path
verify:binary:layout used e_machine 183 (AArch64) as its unsupported
target, which this branch now admits; use EM_RISCV (243) instead.
The unsupported-host provider test now asserts the refusal names this
host's platform/arch and says the target was not read, so reverting the
decoder to the old message fails it.
* feat(binary-layout): admit ELF32 i386, ARM and MIPS layout profiles
inspect_binary_layout refused every ELF32 object, so router and IoT
firmware (ARM32, MIPS32) got no layout facts at all.
The pwntools adapter now admits EXEC/DYN/REL objects in these profiles:
ELF64 x86-64, ELF32 i386, ELF32 little-endian ARM and ELF32 little- or
big-endian MIPS. Header fields are read in the declared byte order, the
ELF32 header is bounds-checked at 52 bytes, and pwntools' own reported
architecture, class and byte order must match the admitted profile.
Other machines, classes and byte orders keep an unsupported_target
refusal that names the admitted profiles.
The output schema admits exactly those architecture combinations, and
the Evidence subject now names the reported machine instead of always
claiming x86_64.
verify:binary:layout cross-compiles i386, ARM, MIPS and MIPSel
executables and relocatable objects (never executed) and checks every
section name, address, offset and size against GNU readelf through CLI
and MCP. The real-binary-layout workflow installs those toolchains.
Refs #6934
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* ci(binary-layout): install target libc headers for ELF32 fixtures
--no-install-recommends skips the libc6-dev-*-cross packages the cross
compilers only recommend, so the i686 fixture fell back to the host's
/usr/include and failed to find bits/libc-header-start.h. Install the
four target libc development packages explicitly.
Refs #6934
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(binary-layout): size the minimum symbol entry by ELF class
The relocation reference check required a 24-byte Elf64_Sym entry, so
every positive symbol reference in an ELF32 report was refused as
unreadable output. Elf32_Sym is 16 bytes; take the minimum from the
reported class. A 64-bit table with 16-byte entries is still refused.
Refs #6934
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test(binary-layout): compare ELF32 symbols and relocations with readelf
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: morluto <76467478+morluto@users.noreply.github.com>
JANG BYUNGKUN