* fix(native)!: preserve value-flow absence semantics
* test(native): compare value-flow reasons with their owners
Stop freezing the unrecorded and Kuna unavailable sentences. Assert the
procedure-scoped unknown and that an explicit provider reason is preserved.
---------
Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>
* fix(native): retain value trace source evidence
* fix(native): build trace error evidence only on failure
* test(mcp): expect unowned value trace refusal
* test(mcp): avoid freezing trace error wording
* test(native): keep value-trace stop coverage with source evidence
Main's stop and continuation cases now meet the trace's evidence-owner
precondition: direct calls supply a source id, and a completed MCP trace
runs in a session that can retain it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>
* feat(native): label binary overview counts with their inventory scope
`binary_overview` described its counts as "exhaustive", and its result was
a pair of bare scalars. An agent could read them as a discovery of every
function and string in the file, or as comparable across providers. They
are exact totals of the rows each provider's inventories return.
The shared `projectBinaryOverview` now adds one provider-neutral
`inventory_coverage` record, so Ghidra's direct summary and the
listing fallback carry the same record:
`{ scope: "provider_inventory", discovery_coverage: "unknown" }`.
The record reuses the `discovery_coverage` vocabulary that
`list_procedures({detail:"summary"})` already reports, now owned by one
domain schema. The tool description states the scope and that counts are
not comparable across providers. Counts, segment omission semantics and
limitations are unchanged.
Fixes#8287
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(native): label overviews in the workflow so older snapshots stay valid
Analysis snapshots replay the projected inventory summary. A snapshot saved
before inventory_coverage existed would then fail the overview output schema.
The record describes what overview counts mean, whoever produced them, so
the binary_overview workflow now adds it on both its provider-summary and
listing paths. Provider values and projectBinaryOverview are unchanged, and
the composed overview's linked atomic record stays as the provider
reported it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(native): refresh composed overviews from before inventory_coverage
Bump the binary_overview workflow revision to 5, so snapshot and CLI replay
recompute a revision-4 composed overview from its atomic record. Replay
would otherwise return the cached overview without its count labels. The
revision-4 case joins the existing refresh scenario. The atomic Evidence
is not rewritten.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(decompile): keep provider no-pseudocode facts on batch items
A batch_decompile item whose provider answered without pseudocode was
reported as unreadable output with doctor guidance, and the provider's
reason, such as a Kuna export failure for that entry, survived only in the
batch-wide limitations. The workflow read only the observation's result.
Read each item's complete observation. A null answer is now a
capability_unavailable item naming the provider, and every item answered
without usable text keeps that observation's own limitations, so a
batch-only Evidence export retains the association. Empty or non-text
pseudocode stays unreadable output; typed provider failures and successful
items are unchanged, and the batch Evidence still aggregates every caveat.
The batch workflow revision changes so earlier snapshots are not replayed
with the previous item semantics.
Fixes#8226
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(decompile): match null-pseudocode guidance to reported caveats
A null answer without caveats told the caller to read item limitations
that the batch omits when the list is empty. The guidance now depends on
whether that observation reported caveats, and says the provider gave no
further explanation when it did not.
The batch tests now select their contracts by name from the enhanced and
session families instead of the full catalog.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
