Files
reverse-engineering-anything/.github/pull_request_template.md
T
a67525cdf1 docs: organize canonical documentation layout and verify new pages (#2791)
* docs: organize canonical documentation layout (URGENTE)

Group all existing authored guides by domain and ownership, expose complete navigation, and preserve their public routes. Update physical path consumers and release configuration while retaining historical records. Document domain-based specs and ADR slugs without global numbering.

Co-Authored-By: Codex <noreply@openai.com>

* fix(docs): honor home layout in all-page route verification

* style: format reviewed source changes

* fix(docs): preserve routes and navigation cache inputs

* fix: repair the static-check failures on the default branch (#2895)

* fix: repair the static-check failures on the default branch

The default branch fails its own required `Static checks` job three ways, so
every pull request reports that job as failed regardless of its own change.

- `npm run format:check` reports `src/domain/functionComparison.test.ts` and
  `src/ida/IdaOperationRunner.ts`.
- `npm run lint` reports a duplicate `import { join } from "node:path"` in
  `tests/boundary/mcp/ghidraInventoryMcp.test.ts` (lines 4 and 17).
- `npm run typecheck` reports `format: "devin"` missing from the client format
  union in `src/application/SupportedClients.ts`, and an unchecked index in
  `tests/boundary/cli/clientProfileLifecycle.test.ts`, whose pair array is
  inferred as `string[][]`.

Apply the pinned formatter, drop the duplicate import, list the `"devin"` format
that its own definition already uses, and mark the pair array `as const`.

Validation: `npm run check:fast` and `npm run format:check` pass.

* fix(setup): keep Devin on the JSON configuration dialect

---------

Co-authored-by: 吴佳浩 <wujiahao@supremind.com>
Co-authored-by: morluto <76467478+morluto@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(docs): update links after guide relocation

* docs: correct verified documentation route counts

* fix(docs): update browser capture guide link after move (#2820)

Refresh gettext protected-link comments alongside the authored href.

Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>

* fix(docs): include http3 lab in stable routes

* fix(docs): preserve historical release evidence and links

* fix(ghidra): restore Windows verifier identity import

* docs(wakaru): preserve pinned upstream policy link

* docs(index): retain recently added guide links

* docs(mcp): preserve parent retention clarification

* fix(cli): preserve standalone import guidance

* fix(test): preserve translated guide link drift coverage

---------

Co-authored-by: Matheus Breguêz <matbrgz@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Co-authored-by: morluto <17176810+morluto@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: 吴佳浩Alben <35291372+XiaoBinGan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: 吴佳浩 <wujiahao@supremind.com>
2026-11-08 01:42:28 +08:00

7.0 KiB

Summary

Problem and expected behavior

Change and scope

Follow the contribution scope. Unresolved scope, authority, side effects, or required verification block integration. Link the required maintainer scope decision for new providers or capabilities involving target execution, injection, mutation, or protection recovery; ordinary fixes within existing boundaries may state "not applicable". Draft PRs may leave the scope decision pending and the readiness and merge checklists unchecked. Maintainers can help resolve open questions.

Contract and boundary impact

  • Semantic owner and earliest changed stage:
  • Contribution scope fit and linked maintainer decision:
  • CLI and MCP/tool-catalog contract:
  • Provider, bridge, target-format, or platform compatibility:
  • Evidence, artifact, provenance, or reconstruction contract:
  • Target selection, authority, upstream behavior, and cleanup details (if applicable):
  • Generated metadata (docs/public/product-catalog.json), package, or installation impact (CI generates and validates ignored catalogs and skills/; edit authored instructions in .agents/skills/reverse-engineer-anything/ and never commit build outputs):

Expected effects (check known effects; use documentation-only on its own). Unchecked items do not establish absence; leave uncertainties visible.

  • Read existing files or captured data.
  • Launch or attach to a process.
  • Inject instrumentation or run scripts/code.
  • Change process memory, registers, files, or configuration.
  • Contact network services.
  • Recover protected code or work around protections.
  • Documentation or usability only; no target interaction.
  • Not sure yet; investigation or maintainer guidance needed.

Evidence and regression coverage

  • Tests added or updated:
  • Base reproduction or other evidence:
  • User-visible CLI/MCP output (if applicable):
  • Remaining proof gaps:

For boundary fixes, identify the applicable boundary regressions and lifecycle regressions covered by the evidence above, and explain relevant gaps.

For evidence-bearing changes:

  • Observed, derived, and inferred claims remain distinguishable.
  • Artifact identity, source provenance, and failed attempts remain preserved.
  • Unsupported, incomplete, unavailable, or uncertain outcomes remain visible.

Validation performed

  • command — result

Compatibility, safety, and release

  • Breaking changes or migration steps:
  • Real Hopper/Ghidra, browser, or OS coverage:
  • Package or release metadata impact:
  • Security, privacy, process, or containment review:

Author readiness

Human owner:

  • I reviewed the final diff and relevant existing code, understand the change and its edge cases, and take responsibility for the complete PR, including AI-assisted work.
  • I checked the evidence above, confirmed it supports the current change, and recorded meaningful validation gaps.
  • I declare this PR ready for initial maintainer review.

Before merge

  • This PR addresses a concrete problem or an agreed enhancement.
  • Material scope and authority questions are resolved, and any required maintainer scope decision covers the final diff.
  • The PR has one focused outcome and the title follows type(scope): outcome.
  • Related issue is linked, or the reason for not linking one is stated above.
  • Tests cover changed observable behavior and meaningful failure paths.
  • Owning docs, contracts, and generated metadata are updated where needed.
  • User-visible CLI/MCP changes include representative output.
  • I checked the final diff for secrets, unrelated cleanup, and unsupported claims.